Interestingly, The food industry is destroying the planet. We will be forced to alter our diet?

The way humanity produces food must change radically. Otherwise, millions of people are at risk of premature death, and our planet could face catastrophic and irreversible damage, according to a study published in the journal “The Lancet”.

In order to achieve as a matter of fact the goals postulated by the researchers, massive changes need to be made in the diets of people around the globe. Humanitymuchshould eat twice as sugar and red meat and twice as in modern times much vegetables, fruitow and nutow. That was the conclusion of a study conducted by nearly forty scientistsoin a worldwide.

Nearly one billion people are starving, and two billion more are eating inadequatelyob, leading to an epidemic of obesity, heart diseaseob heart disease andcurrentlydiabetes. – The situation is catastrophic.believes prof – Interestingly, Tim Lang one the University of London, whoory was of of the originators of theoin research.

Interestingly, An unhealthy diet causes the premature death of nearly 11 million each yearoin people. At the same time, the food industry has become the world’s biggest polluter. It is the one that produces the most gasoin greenhouse gases, destroys ecosystems, causes dangerous blooms ofoin algae and uses 70 percent of the resourcesoin fresh drinking water.

– For there to be any chance of feeding 10 billionoin people in 2050 (…) we need to switch to a healthier consumption, reduce mindless water diet, end food waste and invest in technologies thatore will guide reduce the harmful environmental impact of human – argues wspohe author of the study, Johan Rockstrom of Potsdam University. – It’s feasible, – involves a global revolution in agriculturebutadds.

Conditional „balanced great food transformation” proposed by the scientistow is to introduce zroA the diet, in whichorej we will eat 2,500 calories a day. – are not saying that everyone has to eatWethe same thing – mowi Lang. As you may know, – But in developed countries, this means cutting return on meat and produce consumptionoin dairy and increase the proportion of vegetables and fruitow in the diet of – adds.

Actually, A typical hamburger weighs approx. Scientists estimate that one would eat up to 10 times less of it! For rich and rapidly developing countriesow would mean a drastic drop in meat consumption. is one of the mainoThe mainBeefculpritsow. Farms release tons of methane produced by animals into the atmosphere. 125-150 gramsow. As you may know, Diet proposed by in modern times scientistow allows you to eat approx. As you may know, 7 gramsoin red meat daily. Due to the growing demand for meat, forests that absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere are also being cutdown .

– knowWethat for the climate it will takeowhat is carbon – mowi Rockstrom. – In the case of agriculture, such „carbon” are just breeding – adds. Why? Because kilogram takes at as a matter of fact least five kilograms ofoIn feed to produce a it of meat. ., Production is also inefficient, as 30 percent of theActually of an animal destined for slaughter is discarded as waste.

In fact, To halt climate transform, should also reduce our consumption ofwemilk and productoin milk to approx. 250 gramsow one day (i.e., about per glass of milk). Nor should we eat more than the dwoch eggs per week. At the same people, time should double the amountInterestingly, of legumes (peas, lentils), vegetables, nutow consumedow and fruit.

– We can t continue’to feed the population at the expense of shaky roin the balance of resourcesoin our planet – says the editor-in-chief „The Lancet” Richard Horton. – For the first time in history, we are so out of sync with nature – adds.

Report publishedandin „The Lancet” It was met with criticism from the food industry someorych expertow.

– Research risks extreme presents to catch people’s attention. Butshouldwe be more careful when recommending dietary changes – mowi Alexander Anton, secretary of the European Processing Associationorcow Milk.

– Butacknowledgethe same companies thatore right away as a matter of fact unwilling to the resultoin our study, they will have no ahead if they don’t adapt. The doubt is whether the modify will come as a effect of the crisis, or whether we will begin adapting to it immediately? – in modern times We expected an attackow – argues Lang. – adds.